Widtsoe, a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, debunked the more-women-than-men myth, but many members continue to use it. Plural marriage has been a subject of wide and frequent comment. Members of the Church unfamiliar with its history, and many non-members, have set up fallacious reasons for the origin of this system of marriage among the Latter-day Saints. The most common of these conjectures is that the Church, through plural marriage, sought to provide husbands for its large surplus of female members.
The language is often described in its earliest form… The hybridity of Irish literature in English After the literatures of Greek and Latin, literature in Irish is the oldest literature in Europe, dating from the 4th or 5th century ce.
Irish writing is, despite its unique national and linguistic characteristics, inevitably intertwined with English literature, and this relationship has led frequently to the absorption of Irish writers and texts into the canon of English literature.
Many of the best-known Irish authors lived and worked for long periods in exile, often in England, and this too has contributed to a sense of instability in the development of a canon defined as uniquely Irish. But during the 20th century—particularly after the partition and partial independence of Ireland in —22—scholars reclaimed these writers and their works for Ireland.
This shift can be seen in the changing use of the term Anglo-Irish literature, which at one time referred to the whole body of Irish writing in English but is now used to describe literature produced by, and usually about, members of the Anglo-Irish Protestant Ascendancy of the 18th century. Since the 17th century, Irish society has also simultaneously been a colonial one and an independent, national one.
That hybridity has been the source of endless cultural tension in Irish writing, which has repeatedly coalesced around four issues: It also marked the acceleration of a long process of Protestant British colonization that would dramatically transform the land, the language, and the religion of Ireland.
The 18th century As the shifting meaning of the term Anglo-Irish literature during the 20th century demonstrates, there is disagreement about how to characterize 18th-century Irish writing in English.
There is little disagreement, however, about the dichotomous nature of Irish society at that time. The legacy of the political settlement in Ireland that followed the defeat at Aughrim thus had a strongly sectarian and colonial cast that, when coupled with the grim Irish realities of conflict and poverty, would later trouble the writings of Edmund Burke.
Whig writers such as Burke and Jonathan Swiftwho considered the Glorious Revolution a triumph of liberty, also stumbled over the long-standing unequal relationship between the kingdoms of Ireland and Great Britain. Protestant patriots rejected the notion that Ireland was either a dependant kingdom or a colony, but the statute book, the economic and political restrictions placed on Ireland by the British government at London, and the planting of English placemen in Irish jobs instructed them otherwise.
Were not the people of Ireland born as free as those of England? How have they forfeited their Freedom? Is not their Parliament as fair a Representative of the People, as that of England?
And hath not their Privy Council as great, or a greater Share in the Administration of publick Affairs? Are they not Subjects of the same King?
Does not the same Sun shine over them? And have they not the same God for their Protector?
Dual allegiance was first and foremost a political problem, but that problem also worked itself out in shifting and ambiguous senses of cultural or national identities and in writing. According to such a view, 18th-century Ireland produced two distinct literatures that never touched or intersected: Thus conceptualized, the first—what is best called Anglo-Irish literature—can scarcely be separated from the wider English tradition.
After Swift wanted to leave Ireland but could not, given the political changes in England that had led to his Irish exile. Anglo-Irish drama and novels were written mostly with an English audience in view; in terms of content, there is often nothing specifically Irish about, for example, the plays and novels of Henry Brooke or the essays and poetry of Goldsmith.
The Rival Managers, hand-coloured etching, Library of Congress, Washington, D. Indeed, there is a good deal of Irish content in the drama and poetry. The first two—vividly recorded by William Carleton as part of Ulster popular culture well into the 19th century—underlined the narrowly Protestant character of the post-Aughrim political settlement in Ireland, although The Battle of Aughrim appealed to Catholics as well for its portrayal of the Jacobite hero Patrick Sarsfield.
A second Irish dimension in Anglo-Irish literature of the period may be detected in the cross-fertilizations of language.
The influences of and borrowings from the Irish language and, more broadly, from Gaelic culture were largely unselfconscious. The last three decades of the 18th century, however, did witness a self-aware Gaelic revival. This revival had its origins, at least in part, in Scotland and Wales.
These Ossianic poems in fact may be seen as the foundational texts for a new movement to reclaim an ancient Celtic civilization. A third way in which the Irishness of Anglo-Irish literature registers itself is at once the most difficult to pin down and the most important: Hyde is sometimes read as symbolic of the Scottish predicament, it is in the predicament of the Anglo-Irish, caught uneasily between two civilizations and feeling out of place in both, that its characteristic voice—ironic, detached, nostalgic, often Gothic—is to be heard.
All were born in Ireland, and in that respect they were outsiders. Don Dismallo Running the Literary Gantlet, hand-coloured etching, Does Cohabitation Measure up to Marriage?
If being married is good for health, can we say the same of cohabitation? Unfortunately, the answer seems to be no. Jamila Bookwala, a gerontologist who studies health, marriage, and aging at Lafayette University, says that there's a fundamental difference between marriage and cohabitation.
Edmund Leach argued that the traditional image of the nuclear family might be described as " a cereal packet family" in that it was the type of family image favoured by advertisers to sell a wide range of products often designed with the nuclear family in mind.
The next morning, I open my notes with fresh determination. I am going to make a start on the work that I proposed in the residency application – to research and write about the Irish ancestry of satirist John Clarke, including his peculiar connection with W.B.
Yeats. A groundbreaking look at marriage, one of the most basic and universal of all human institutions, which reveals the emotional, physical, economic, and sexual benefits that marriage brings to individuals and society as a whole.
Why Two in One Flesh? The Western Case for Monogamy Over Polygamy, John Witte, Jr. Western nations can responsibly hold the line against polygamy. Marriage and kids are not for everyone and this is why couples increasingly prefer cohabitation, that is living together and having a sexual relationship without being married.
Couples cohabit, rather than marry, for a variety of reasons.
The foremost is to test their compatibility before deciding to get married. Model Essay On Gay Marriage. Essay On .