The story seems to support the Marxist claim that people are mere creations of social or economic circumstance. Prior to going our textual analysis, we must have a detailed idea about Marxism as well as Marxist literary criticism.
People today believe that inanimate objects make them more presentable or they see it as a confidence builder. The story uses the necklace and dress as symbols of accessories that she needs to feel like she can fit in with the people at the party. Everyone has something they use as a confidence builder or a lucky charm that helps them through events.
Society expectations are so high that we will do anything to fit in. Her attitude changed dramatically because she realizes that she needs more jewelry.
She decides to borrow a diamond necklace from a friend. The party began and she felt like the most beautiful woman just because of a necklace.
Symbolism is shown thoroughly during the party the necklace empowers her and gives her the confidence to walk with her head high. When the party was over she realized that she lost the necklace when she was getting undress later that morning. Some symbols for this story include of course the necklace which she lost to symbolize the beauty and look of wealth that she had when she went to that party.
She lost that look of wealth just as she lost that necklace. The look of wealth was fake and so was the necklace but just by the way it looked it gave her power.
Power is the reason for symbolism every day. People want to express themselves on what they are wearing or what they have. For a critical analysis essay, you need at least three rhetorical devices.
Use of symbolism is one, now three more.
Browse hundreds of Prewriting tutors.The Necklace; Guy de Maupassant; Theory Into Practice: An Introduction to Literary Criticism; Ann Dobie; Storybites: An Analysis of Guy de Maupassant's "The Necklace" Cummings Study Guide: The Necklace; About the Author.
Rudy Miller has been writing professionally since Miller is a digital team leader for initiativeblog.com, a local. - Irony in Maupassant's The Necklace Guy de Maupassant's "The Necklace" is situational irony written in The story was written in a time when there were very distinct social classes primarily determined by .
The Necklace Guy De Maupassant Literary Criticism. Guy de Maupassant has a dark humor and likes to see Mathilde and her husband struggle. In The Necklace a women named Mathilde is lended a diamond necklace for a ball by a women named Madame Forestier.
Literary theories are lenses to look at a literary text through.
Here I will try to read Guy De Maupassant’s “The Diamond Necklace” from Marxist perspective. A Marxist reading of the story provides us to look into this short story from a Marxist point of view that means how Karl Marx and Frederic Engels’s Marxist theory implies on this text.
by Guy de Maupassant In the classic short story The Necklace, the main character Mathilde loses a borrowed necklace and spends the next ten years of her life paying loans for a initiativeblog.com ironic twist occurs at the end when the friend who lent her the necklace in the first place reveals that it .
Following his service in the Franco-Prussian War of , Guy de Maupassant studied with the seminal French writer Gustave Flaubert. From Flaubert, de Maupassant learned that his job as a.